History COINS

FINANCE-MEDIA

The investigation is being conducted by the Women’s Council

On April 13, 2020, the head of the Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, issued an order “On the formation of the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.”

The Women’s Council currently includes: employees of the central office of the Russian Investigative Committee - Anna Tarasova, Nadezhda Repina and Ekaterina Mutuzkina; spouses of employees of the Russian Investigative Committee - Anna Savenkova, Anna Barmina, Elena Kameneva, Lina Karasova, Yulia Konnova, Elena Pavlishina, Maria Yurina, Olga Fedosova; as well as the representative of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia in Moscow, Yulia Buzhinskaya.

According to information from the official page of the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, questions should be addressed by email Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.. This is an important point in our investigation.

Yulia Buzhinskaya was the head of the 4th control and investigative department of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in Moscow. As sources told Infopressa, it was under her strict leadership that all material evidence was destroyed in criminal case No. 11902450036000072, initiated on the death of a minor, on the basis of an inspection of KRSP 429 pr-19.

As follows from the materials of the criminal case regarding the death of a child, the materials are consistently transferred for consideration to the Office of the Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in Moscow, but they do not stay there for long, since in order to make a decision and determine further investigative actions, they are transferred to the recently created Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee Committee of the Russian Federation. The current situation suits the prosecutor’s office, which did not see any violations in the transfer of the criminal case materials to the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

It is worth recalling that the Women’s Council was created with the aim of strengthening the family, i.e. friendly corporate family? And also a moral issue.

It is worth recalling that clause 19 of the Regulations on the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation directly indicates the inadmissibility of the Women’s Council’s interference in the activities of the Investigative Committee, but can any provisions stop the Amazons endowed with power and shoulder straps?

The role of the Women’s Council in the structures of the Investigative Committee, the Prosecutor’s Office and the Courts is so strong that even the Chairman of the court is forced to send requests not only to the head of the Investigative Committee for the Southern Administrative District of the Main Investigative Committee of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in Moscow, but also to the email addresses of the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

This advice can easily turn Bastrykin’s gaze in the “right direction.” And while the Heads of the Investigative Committee and the Prosecutor’s Office are looking in the right direction for the Women’s Council under the Investigative Committee, the Women’s Council can easily review the materials of criminal cases, direct the course of the investigation taking into account the “agreements” and ignore the requests of the Chairman of the Court.

Does the current absurd situation with the newly created council indicate the weakness of the Chairman of the Investigative Committee?